Model config
Model Comparison & Pricing
Compare AI models by performance, features, and pricing
AI Model Comparison Overview
High-End Model Options
| Model | Provider | Context Window | Input Price* | Output Price* | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Anthropic | 1M tokens | $3-6 | $15-22.50 | Dependable tool execution, sophisticated code projects |
| GPT-5 | OpenAI | 400K tokens | $1.25 | $10 | Cutting-edge OpenAI capabilities, tri-modal operation |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 1M+ tokens | TBD | TBD | Extensive repositories, document processing | |
| Qwen3 Coder | Multiple | 256K tokens | $0.20 | $0.80 | Development work, open-source adaptability |
*Pricing shown per million tokens
Cost-Effective Model Options
| Model | Provider | Context Window | Input Price* | Output Price* | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V3 | DeepSeek | 128K tokens | $0.14 | $0.28 | Exceptional value for everyday development |
| DeepSeek R1 | DeepSeek | 128K tokens | $0.55 | $2.19 | Top choice for affordable reasoning |
| Qwen3 32B | Multiple | 128K tokens | Varies | Varies | Community-driven, diverse hosting options |
| Z AI GLM 4.5 | Z AI | 128K tokens | TBD | TBD | Open-source licensed, combined reasoning approach |
*Pricing shown per million tokens
Performance Analysis
Balancing Speed Against Quality
| Priority | Recommended Model | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Qwen3 Coder on Cerebras | Unmatched processing velocity |
| Quality | Claude Sonnet 4.5 | Superior accuracy for demanding workflows |
| Balance | DeepSeek V3 | Strong performance without premium costs |
Tool Execution Dependability
Rankings based on how reliably models handle tool operations:
- Claude Sonnet 4.5 - Consistently accurate tool handling
- GPT-5 - Outstanding performance with minor format quirks
- Gemini 2.5 Pro - Solid choice for conventional tools
- DeepSeek V3 - Dependable with straightforward tools
- Qwen3 variants - Complex tools might require additional attempts
Expense Analysis
Common Development Task Pricing
| Task Type | Token Usage (avg) | Claude Sonnet | DeepSeek V3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Bug Fix | 5K tokens | $0.05 | $0.001 | 50x cheaper |
| Feature Implementation | 50K tokens | $0.50 | $0.01 | 50x cheaper |
| Large Refactoring | 200K tokens | $2.00 | $0.04 | 50x cheaper |
Projected Monthly Spending
| Budget | Claude Usage | DeepSeek Usage | Mixed Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10/month | ~20 features | ~1000 features | Plan: DeepSeek, Act: Claude |
| $50/month | ~100 features | ~5000 features | Critical: Claude, Rest: DeepSeek |
| $100/month | ~200 features | ~10000 features | Complex: Claude, Simple: DeepSeek |
Service Provider Evaluation
Available Provider Capabilities
| Provider | Models Available | Billing | API Stability | Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sypha | Multiple | Credit-based | High | In-app |
| Anthropic | Claude only | Usage-based | High | |
| OpenRouter | 100+ models | Usage-based | High | Discord |
| OpenAI | GPT only | Usage-based | High | Forum |
| Local (Ollama) | Open source | Free | N/A | Community |
Selecting the Right Provider
Pick your provider according to these priorities:
- Simplicity: Sypha (eliminates API key hassle)
- Variety: OpenRouter (comprehensive model catalog)
- Direct Access: Individual providers (Anthropic, OpenAI)
- Privacy: Ollama or LM Studio (locally-hosted options)
Usage Patterns from Sypha Users
Live data reflecting actual Sypha community preferences:
- Check live statistics at OpenRouter's Sypha stats
- Most popular: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (40%)
- Rising star: DeepSeek V3 (25%)
- Budget favorite: Qwen3 variants (20%)